Skip to main content

Watchdog Group Sues for Records on Whether Investigation of Erik Prince Was ‘Influenced’ by ‘DOJ Officials Seeking to Accommodate’ Trump

 
Erik Prince

Erik Prince in Washington, D.C. on November 30, 2017

A government watchdog group on Tuesday filed a lawsuit accusing the Justice Department of violating federal public records laws by wrongfully withholding non-exempt documents pertaining to an investigation of whether mercenary and Donald Trump ally Erik Prince lied to Congress amid the Russia probe.

In a complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) claimed that the government had failed to follow the law by not providing responses to its requests for public information concerning the Prince probe and whether it may have been affected by the Blackwater founder’s close ties to the Trump administration.

The request stems from Prince allegedly providing false testimony to the House Intelligence Committee in 2017 when discussing his meetings with a Russian banker in the Seychelles islands in early 2017.

As previously reported by Law&Crime, Prince was accused of lying about the genesis of the meetings by calling them “chance” encounters when he was actually involved in planning the gatherings. He also allegedly lied by claiming he was not acting as a Trump representative when, in fact he was being briefed and debriefed before and after  the meetings by Trump’s camp.

Citing the Mueller Report, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) promptly made a criminal referral of Prince to DOJ, asserting that Prince misled congressional investigators. Schiff asked for DOJ to investigate whether there was sufficient evidence to prove Prince lied to Congress.

As the case against Prince failed to materialize, CREW filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request in February 2020 seeking “information regarding whether any DOJ investigation related to Mr. Prince had been influenced by political considerations or by DOJ officials seeking to accommodate President Trump” (the Tuesday lawsuit also said that it was challenging the “failure of DOJ to respond to a request for documents related to DOJ investigations into Erik Prince and whether those investigations were influenced by political considerations or by DOJ officials seeking to accommodate then-President Trump”).

That request included all documents “reflecting any investigation, review, or other action” taken by the DOJ in response to Schiff’s request. The group also sought all communications concerning Prince between the DOJ and Trump or other administration officials, including former Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, who is Prince’s older sister.

CREW additionally emphasized the importance of the documents by pointing to what happened with the criminal prosecution of longtime Trump confidant Roger Stone, saying the DOJ’s reversal of his sentencing recommendation suggested “alarming political interference in the criminal justice process.” Stone went on to be pardoned by Trump.

CREW asked a federal judge to order the DOJ to immediately process and produce the applicable documents and award the organization reasonable attorney’s fees associated with pursuing the request in court.

Read the full lawsuit below.

Erik Prince Complaint by Law&Crime on Scribd

[image via Mark Wilson/Getty Images]

Have a tip we should know? [email protected]

Filed Under:

Follow Law&Crime:

Jerry Lambe is a journalist at Law&Crime. He is a graduate of Georgetown University and New York Law School and previously worked in financial securities compliance and Civil Rights employment law.