Skip to main content

Trump’s Legal Team ‘Blew Up’ DOJ Argument Against Releasing Mueller Grand Jury Materials


President Donald Trump’s impeachment defense team “blew up” another one of the Justice Department’s primary legal arguments in a critical federal case. This time it contradicted the DOJ argument against allowing House Democrats access to sealed grand jury material produced by former special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation.

House impeachment investigators looking into whether Trump obstructed justice in the special counsel’s Russia probe asked a federal court to release the accompanying grand jury material gathered during the investigation.

In response, the DOJ filed a lawsuit claiming lawmakers were not entitled to the grand jury material because impeachment trials were not “judicial proceedings” under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e), which allows for the disclosure of such material in certain situations.

The case is currently before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit after a lower court ruled in favor of releasing the material to House Democrats.

But Trump defense attorney Ken Starr–the former independent counsel who spearheaded the impeachment of former President Bill Clinton–may have delivered a fatal blow to the administration’s claim, arguing that an impeachment proceeding in the Senate unequivocally constitutes a judicial proceeding under the law.

“The Senate is a court,” Starr argued during the proceedings. “In fact, history teaches us that for literally decades, this body was referred to in this context as the high court of impeachment. So we are not a legislative chamber during these proceedings. We are in a tribunal. We are in court.”

House General Counsel Douglas Letter on Tuesday filed a letter with the federal appellate court highlighting the contradictory claims.

“That argument has not been contradicted by the president’s counsel’s statements to the Senate, which confirm that the Senate sits as a ‘court’ rather than a ‘legislative chamber’ during an impeachment trial,” Letter wrote to the court. “Because DOJ’s position in this case cannot be reconciled with the president’s position with impeachment, DOJ may wish to withdraw its argument that Senate impeachment trial does as judicial proceeding.”

A similar conflict arose last week when Trump’s attorneys argued that House investigators were required to fight legal opposition to witness subpoenas in court, contradicting the DOJ’s argument that the House cannot enforce a subpoena of former White House counsel Don McGahn in court.

Read the full House letter below:

House GJ Letter by Law&Crime on Scribd

[image via Senate Television via Getty Images]

Have a tip we should know? [email protected]

Filed Under:

Follow Law&Crime:

Jerry Lambe is a journalist at Law&Crime. He is a graduate of Georgetown University and New York Law School and previously worked in financial securities compliance and Civil Rights employment law.