Skip to main content

San Francisco Lawmaker Introduces ‘CAREN Act’ to Stop ‘Racist 911 Calls’


A member of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors is introducing an ordinance that would specifically criminalize racist 911 calls. Shamann Walton said it’s called the “CAREN Act: Caution Against Racially Exploitative Non-Emergencies. You know, like the pejorative term “Karen.”

“With the rise of smartphones, there has been an increase of racial profiling and discriminatory incidents recorded and shared on social media and subsequently broadcasted on the news nationwide,” said a statement from Walton’s office. “Within the last month and a half in the Bay Area, an individual called the police on a Black man who was dancing and exercising on the street in his Alameda neighborhood and a couple called the police on a Filipino man stenciling ‘Black Lives Matter’ in chalk in front of his own residence in San Francisco’s Pacific Heights.”

The Lisa AlexanderJames Juanillo incident, which Walton’s office referred to in the statement above, was watched more than 23 million times.

Walton is coordinating with California Assemblyman Rob Bonta (D-18th District), the sponsor of a similar bill called AB-1550, which lets people bring civil actions if they are the subject of a bigoted 911 call.

From the bill:

(a) A person may bring a civil action in any court of competent jurisdiction against any responsible party who, motivated by the persons’ race, religion, sex, or any other protected status, through the use of a “911” call knowingly causes a peace officer to arrive at a location to contact the person with the intent to do any of the following:

(1) Infringe upon the person’s rights under either the California Constitution or the United States Constitution.

(2) Unlawfully discriminate against the person.

(3) Cause the person to feel harassed, humiliated, or embarrassed.

(4) Cause the person to be expelled from a place in which the other person is lawfully located.

(5) Damage the person’s reputation or standing within the community.

(6) Damage the person’s financial, economic, consumer, or business prospects or interests.

[Screengrab from the aforementioned stenciling incident involving James Juanillo via ABC 7]

Have a tip we should know? [email protected]

Filed Under:

Follow Law&Crime: