Skip to main content

Here’s Why Epstein’s Non-Prosecution Agreement Doesn’t Prohibit New Indictment


Some people have been asking why Jeffrey Epstein‘s 2007 federal non-prosecution agreement with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida doesn’t prohibit new federal charges. Well, there’s a straightforward answer for that. It only covered that office, and has no binding effect on federal prosecutors for the Southern District of New York.

U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman clarified this point in a press conference on Monday, saying that the SDNY wasn’t a signatory to the agreement. Nonetheless, this dynamic was already pretty clear when news about Epstein’s arrest broke this weekend.

Law&Crime trial analyst Gene Rossi, a former federal prosecutor for the Eastern District of Virginia, told Law&Crime in a phone interview Sunday that a non-prosecution agreement would only bind the office that made it.

According to an indictment unsealed Monday, Epstein abused dozens of underage girls at his homes in New York City and Palm Beach, Florida. He had victims to visit his homes for sex acts, and had some of them and some of his employees recruit more targets, prosecutors said. Girls were as young as 14 years old.

Esptein was charged with sex trafficking conspiracy and sex trafficking on Monday, but U.S. Attorney Berman suggested these might not be the only crimes Epstein will be charged for. He said a search of Epstein’s New York home over the weekend resulted in the discovery of nude images of young girls.

[Mugshot via Florida Department of Law Enforcement]

Have a tip we should know? [email protected]

Filed Under:

Follow Law&Crime: