Senior Trump administration officials’ Wednesday briefing on the airstrike that took out Iranian Maj. Gen. Qassem Soleimani last week left lawmakers from both sides of the aisle visibly and audibly upset.
Criticism of the administration’s position that Soleimani posed an “imminent threat” has mounted in recent days, as officials have failed to provide evidence to support that.
In a press conference following the briefing, an incensed Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) called the briefing “demeaning” and “insulting.”
“Now, I find this insulting and demeaning – not personally, but to the office – that each of the 100 Senators in this building happens to hold,” he said, seemingly trying to control his anger. “I find it insulting and I find it demeaning to the Constitution of the United States to which we’ve all sworn an oath. It is after all the prerogative of the legislative branch to declare war. Article I, Section 8 makes that very clear.”
The Utah Senator then provided historical context for his anger, explaining how Alexander Hamilton made clear in The Federalist papers that the legislature’s role in declaring war was a “sharp contrast” from the previous form of government which allowed the king alone to bring the nation to war.
“This, Hamilton explained, was exactly the reason why this power was put in Article I, Section 8. In the branch of government most accountable to the people at the most regular intervals,” Lee said.
Lee also said the briefing was inexplicably void of details regarding the administration’s reasoning.
“I don’t know what they had in mind. I went in there hoping to get more specifics as far as the factual, legal, moral, justification for what they did. I’m still undecided on that issue in part because we never got to the details. Every time we got close they’d say ‘well we can’t discuss that here because it’s really sensitive. ‘We’re in a SCIF!,” Lee exclaimed. “We’re in a secure underground bunker where all electronic devices have to be checked at the door, and they still refused to tell us. I find that really upsetting.”
Democrats were equally unimpressed with the administration’s explanation.
“There was no raw evidence presented that this was an imminent threat,” Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) said following the briefing.
Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.) said he was “utterly unpersuaded” by the briefing, which he called “sophomoric and utterly unconvincing.”
Rep. Justin Amash (I-Mich.), a former member of the GOP, echoed Lee and Democrats in saying the administration provided no evidence that Soleimani posed an imminent threat. He also decried the administration’s reliance on the 2002 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) as a legal authority.
Lee clearly didn’t speak for all Republicans, as Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyoming), former Vice President Dick Cheney’s daughter, told reporters the GOP was “absolutely unified as a conference, unified behind the President, unified with respect to the importance, the significance and the righteousness of the action the President took to eliminate Qassem Soleimani from the battlefield.” Cheney notably did not address whether the strike was legally justified.
[image via Fox News screengrab]
Have a tip we should know? [email protected]
Follow Law&Crime:
