Skip to main content

‘A Travesty of Justice’: Jussie Smollett’s Lawyers Call Out Judge Who Allowed Further Review of Case


Attorneys for actor Jussie Smollett are calling out a judge who decided there should be a special prosecutor to review how authorities handled his alleged hoax case.

“This case has been a travesty of justice and an unprecedented deprivation of Mr. Smollett’s constitutional rights, including the presumption of innocence and right to a fair trial,” his attorneys wrote in a motion obtained by The Chicago Sun-Times. “Not only have the media and the public failed to critically look at the evidence (and lack thereof) against Mr. Smollett, but now, the court has accepted false media reports to presume Mr. Smollett guilty of charges which he pled not guilty to and which were dismissed against him.”

Cook County Judge Michael Toomin ruled last month that the special prosecutor will review the handling of the case. This person, still unappointed, would look into why local prosecutors decided to drop the case against Smollett, and why State’s Attorney Kim Foxx seemed to be involved in the investigation even when she said she recused herself.

Police in Chicago said Smollett faked being the victim of a racist, homophobic attack perpetrated by individuals saying, “This is MAGA country.” He recruited Abimbola (Abel) and Olabinjo (Ola) Osundairo to stage the assault, they said.

RELATED: Chicago PD Video at Jussie Smollett’s Apartment Shows He and His Manager Asked Cops to Turn Body Cams Off

Sixteen felony disorderly conduct counts for filing a false report were dropped in March. After that happened, cops and the mayor’s office instisted on Smollett’s guilt.

“After reviewing all of the facts and circumstances of the case, including Mr. Smollet’s volunteer service in the community and agreement to forfeit his bond to the City of Chicago, we believe this outcome is a just disposition and appropriate resolution to this case,” Foxx said in a statement at the time. Foxx, it was later revealed, acknowledged in a text message that she was “recused.” Still, she said she believed Smollett was being “overcharging.”

“Sooo……I’m recused, but when people accuse us of overcharging cases…16 counts on a class 4 becomes exhibit A,” she said. Foxx’s office would say the use if the term recuse “was a colloquial use of the term rather than in its legal sense.”

First assistant state attorney Joseph Magats, the Foxx deputy who handled the case when Foxx said she recused herself, previously told WLS the the dropped charges weren’t an exoneration of Smollett.

“We believe he did what he was charged with doing,” he said.

One reason Smollett’s attorneys would seek to get the special prosecutor appointment cancelled is that the judge said this prosecutor would be allowed to “further prosecute Smollett” if warranted.

“There was no master on the bridge to guide the ship as it floundered through uncharted waters, and it ultimately lost its bearings,” Judge Toomin said. “The unprecedented irregularities identified in this case warrants the appointment of independent counsel to restore the public’s confidence in the integrity of our criminal justice system.”

Colin Kalmbacher contributed to this report.

[Image via Nuccio DiNuzzo/Getty Images]

Have a tip we should know? [email protected]

Filed Under:

Follow Law&Crime: