Skip to main content

People Think Harvey Weinstein’s Getting Special Treatment. He’s Not.


Harvey Weinstein was arrested on Friday morning and charged with sex crimes. More charges could be coming, but a few people are saying he got special treatment due to his status as a rich celebrity film producer:


Those people are mostly wrong, and here is why.

As I pointed out last night, New York criminal procedure law allows prosecutors to haul defendants to court via several different paths. After charges are filed, a defendant must be arraigned before a judge. How the defendant gets there is a matter of procedural choice. There are four possible paths. One, a warrant could be sworn out and a defendant could be arrested. Two, a defendant could turn himself in to be arrested and then hauled to court. Three, if a prosecutor so asks, and if a judge is convinced a defendant will appear, a judge could issue a summons for a defendant to appear for arraignment without being arrested. Four, a prosecutor could direct a defendant to appear in court without an arrest warrant or a formal summons.

Here, Weinstein was actually arrested:

As I explained above, Weinstein didn’t have to be arrested. Under New York law, Weinstein could have been simply asked to appear for an arraignment without an arrest. Instead, here, Weinstein was led out of a police station in handcuffs, likely to the absolute delight of prosecutors, who frequently employ the public spectacle of a “perp walk” to send the visual message to the public that someone is either dangerous, guilty, or — more ethically — being brought to justice. It’s a matter of longstanding debate how the public actually processes and perceives such images of defendants being led to arraignments in cuffs.

Perhaps the comments on Twitter about the speed of the arraignment — which came immediately after arrest — do carry some weight. However, prosecutors and the judge could have gone much, much easier on Weinstein, and they didn’t. What they did was actually among the harsher options available under the law.

Julie Rendelman, a former New York prosecutor and current criminal defense attorney who also serves as a Law &Crime trial analyst, says Weinstein’s bail is actually higher than in other cases with similar charges. In addition, most defendants, if released on significant bail, are not required to also wear an ankle monitor. In other words, he didn’t get special treatment in these areas. Instead, he was treated perhaps more harshly than defendants with similar charges. He was processed like any other defendant in his shoes.

Editor’s note: this piece has been updated to include comments from Rendelman.

[Image via BRYAN R. SMITH/AFP/Getty Images]

Have a tip we should know? [email protected]

Filed Under:

Follow Law&Crime:

Aaron Keller holds a juris doctor degree from the University of New Hampshire School of Law and a broadcast journalism degree from Syracuse University. He is a former anchor and executive producer for the Law&Crime Network and is now deputy editor-in-chief for the Law&Crime website. DISCLAIMER:  This website is for general informational purposes only. You should not rely on it for legal advice. Reading this site or interacting with the author via this site does not create an attorney-client relationship. This website is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney. Speak to a competent lawyer in your jurisdiction for legal advice and representation relevant to your situation.