Skip to main content

Idahoan Seen ‘Screaming Like a Mad Woman’ on CNN During Capitol Siege Will Get Out of Jail Ahead of Trial


An Idaho woman accused of storming the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6th will likely be freed from jail by the end of the day Friday, Magistrate Judge Ronald E. Bush said during an afternoon initial appearance. The judge’s comment came after federal prosecutors declined to argue that incarceration was necessary as Yvonne St Cyr‘s case grinds its way through the courts.

St Cyr, 53, is accused of two misdemeanors related to the deadly siege. She recorded herself spouting off about the election while in and around the U.S. Capitol and posted the videos online.

“Good afternoon, sir,” St Cyr said when addressing the judge for the first time during Friday’s initial appearance.

Judge Bush carefully and methodically walked St Cyr through the proceeding. When asked if she was comfortable doing the hearing via Zoom because of the pandemic, St Cyr said she was comfortable proceeding via videoconference for this specific hearing.

When asked if she’d been given a copy of the criminal complaint filed against her, St Cyr demurred.

“Well, no, actually, I don’t know that I have a copy” of the charging document, St Cyr said.

Her defense attorney said he had reviewed the form with her prior to the hearing.

The judge read the charges.

St Cyr is accused of knowingly entering or remaining in a restricted building or grounds without lawful authority. That charge, the judge explained, is a class A misdemeanor punishable by up to one year in jail, a fine of up to $100,000, up to one year on supervised release, five years on probation, and a special assessment of $25 on top of any fine. She is also accused of violent entry and disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds, a class B misdemeanor punishable by up to 6 months in jail, a $5,000 fine, one year on supervised release, 5 years on probation, and a special assessment of $10.

“Yes, your honor,” St Cyr said when asked if she understood the charges.

St Cyr waived a formal reading of the criminal complaint document in open court.

Judge Bush appointed a public defender to represent St Cyr after a discussion about documents related to the defendant’s finances.

William Miles Pope, St Cyr’s defense attorney, said St Cyr provided her “best attempts to describe her financial situation” despite not having “all her financial paperwork” in front of her in jail.

St Cyr said she was requesting a court-appointed attorney “for right now.”

“I don’t have anything to look at here,” she added. “It’s a rough estimate of what’s going on in our life right now.”

Judge Bush then advised St Cyr of her various legal rights: she’s presumed innocent; she has a right to a trial by jury; the government must prove its case against her beyond a reasonable doubt; she has a right to cross-examine witnesses whom she may order to come to court by subpoena.

“Yes, your honor,” St Cyr said when asked if she understood those rights.

Judge Bush also explained that St Cyr’s case could remain in Idaho, rather than being transferred to Washington, D.C., if she agreed to plea either guilty or no contest to the charges she faces—and if prosecutors in both Idaho and in Washington, D.C. agreed to leave the case in the District of Idaho.

St Cyr waived her right to an identity hearing, where prosecutors would have to prove she is the person named in the complaint, and further waived her rights to a production of a warrant and for a preliminary hearing.

The judge then asked if a detention hearing would be necessary. Such hearings determine whether defendants will remain incarcerated pending trial.

Prosecutor Heather Patricco said the government was not requesting that St Cyr remain locked up. However, Patricco said the government was requesting that St Cyr be ordered to stay away from Washington, D.C., except to attend court or meet with counsel in the nation’s capital. The government also asked the court to require St Cyr to advise pretrial services officials if she planned to leave the State of Idaho. Finally, the government said the court should ban St Cyr from traveling outside the continental United States.

“We have no concerns” with those “conditions,” defense attorney Pope said.

The judge agreed with the prosecution’s request, but said that St Cyr could travel outside the U.S.—but only after obtaining permission from the court itself.

Judge Bush suggested St Cyr would likely be released from jail by the end of the day today.

“It takes a little bit of time to get the order prepared and signed,” the judge said.

When that is done, she’ll be free to go home but must attend future court proceedings. If she doesn’t, the judge explained, she’ll face additional legal trouble.

As Law&Crime previously explained, St Cyr was arrested after she posted videos online showing herself storming the U.S. Capitol with other like-minded individuals.

“Americans are being beaten for wanting to save their country,” she said at one point. “So, welcome to communist America.”

“God put me in that window, so I’m assuming God put me on CNN screaming like a mad woman,” the Idaho Statesman quoted St Cyr as saying. “So hey, maybe I’m going to get arrested again, but I would get arrested and I would die for this country. So no regrets.”

None of the contents of her social media became topics of conversation at Friday’s hearing.

Unlike many other defendants facing charges in the U.S. Capitol siege, prosecutors have notably not accused Cyr of carrying weapons, fighting with the police, or damaging property.

Read the charging documents below:

Yvonne St Cyr Charging Documents by Law&Crime on Scribd

[image via Yvonne St Cyr’s Facebook account]

Have a tip we should know? [email protected]

Filed Under:

Follow Law&Crime:

Aaron Keller holds a juris doctor degree from the University of New Hampshire School of Law and a broadcast journalism degree from Syracuse University. He is a former anchor and executive producer for the Law&Crime Network and is now deputy editor-in-chief for the Law&Crime website. DISCLAIMER:  This website is for general informational purposes only. You should not rely on it for legal advice. Reading this site or interacting with the author via this site does not create an attorney-client relationship. This website is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney. Speak to a competent lawyer in your jurisdiction for legal advice and representation relevant to your situation.