Skip to main content

House Dems Tell Court That Impeachment Inquiry Includes Info Contained in Mueller’s Secret Grand Jury Materials


House Democrats on Tuesday told a federal court that their ongoing impeachment inquiry necessarily involves a tranche of secret grand jury materials utilized by former special counsel Robert Mueller in his report on election interference and obstruction of justice.

Last Friday, an emphatic court order by U.S. District Judge Beryl A. Howell instructed the Department of Justice (DOJ) to provide congressional investigators with those disputed grand jury materials. That order catalogued–and shot down–myriad arguments by the Trump administration in favor of continued secrecy along with criticisms directed at the DOJ’s own argumentative techniques.

On Monday, DOJ attorneys complained the agency would be “irreparably harmed” if those grand jury materials were released. In that filing, Attorney General William Barr’s subordinates moved for a stay of that prior decision pending their motion before the D.C. Court of Appeals.

The DOJ previously argued that House investigators didn’t really need those documents any time soon because of comments previously made by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) which allegedly limited the impeachment inquiry’s focus to President Donald Trump‘s infamously “perfect” July 25 phone call with the president of Ukraine.

That previous court filing by the DOJ argued: “The Speaker has announced that the House impeachment inquiry will focus narrowly on the whistleblower complaint and issues surrounding Ukraine.”

“Although the [House Judiciary Committee] claims that it needs the information promptly because it continues to investigate matters connected to the Mueller Report, there appears little dispute that, for now, that investigation is secondary,” the DOJ earlier argued. “Congressman [Adam] Schiff and the House Intelligence Committee—not the Judiciary Committee—is the lead committee heading the congressional investigation.”

Tuesday’s motion sought to thoroughly rubbish such arguments:

DOJ principally argues that the [grand jury] materials the [House Judiciary] Committee seeks are not related to the House’s ongoing impeachment inquiry, which DOJ asserts “will focus narrowly on the whistleblower complaint and issues surrounding Ukraine.” DOJ is wrong about the scope of the House’s inquiry: as the Committee confirmed at oral argument, “it’s not just Ukraine that’s the focus.”

House Democrats referenced Pelosi’s September 24 remarks announcing the impeachment inquiry to bolster their argument that the impeachment inquiry has always been broad-based.

Again the House’s motion in opposition to DOJ’s requested stay:

After referencing “several months” of “investigat[ions]” by House “Committees” to “gather all the relevant facts and consider whether to … approv[e] articles of impeachment,” Speaker Pelosi “direct[ed] … six Committees”—including the Judiciary Committee, and not just [the House Intelligence Committee]—“to proceed with their investigations under that umbrella of impeachment inquiry.” For months, the Judiciary Committee has been investigating the substantial evidence of misconduct detailed in the Mueller Report as part of the Committee’s consideration of “whether to approve articles of impeachment with respect to the President.”

House Democrats also explicitly noted their intention to follow up any possible leads contained in–and related to the content of–Mueller’s unreleased grand jury materials.

“[T]he [House Judiciary] Committee urgently requires the grand jury information it seeks,” the Tuesday motion pleads. “That information will shed critical light on Russian interference in the 2016 election and President Trump’s potential obstruction of justice. If [the Circuit] Court enters a stay, the [House Judiciary] Committee will be deprived of this important information to which it is entitled.”

The filing, by way of a footnote, also says the DOJ is flat-out wrong about their interpretation of Pelosi’s remarks about the inquiry’s focus.

“Although DOJ again argues—based solely on a Washington Post article—that the Judiciary Committee’s inquiry into these issues is “secondary” to [the House Intelligence Committee’s] Ukraine inquiry, that contention lacks merit for the reasons stated above.”

[image via Mark Wilson/Getty Images]

Have a tip we should know? [email protected]

Filed Under:

Follow Law&Crime: