Skip to main content

Attorneys Left Scratching Their Heads as Trump Campaign Lawyer Does the Unthinkable in Michigan


US President Donald Trump speaks during his final Make America Great Again rally of the 2020 US Presidential campaign at Gerald R. Ford International Airport November 3, 2020, in Grand Rapids, Michigan.

President Donald Trump’s lead campaign attorney in Michigan filed a patently false motion to dismiss their own election fraud-themed lawsuit on Thursday. The filing’s false claims prompted legal experts to wonder what, exactly, is going on in the Wolverine State.

RELATED: Detroit Asks Court to Issue Sanction After Trump Campaign Lawyer Used Court Filing to ‘Spread Disinformation’

Attorney Mark F. “Thor” Hearne II submitted the motion with the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan in order to stop the campaign’s legal efforts at blocking the certification of the 2020 presidential election results in Wayne County specifically and across Michigan generally.

“Plaintiffs voluntarily dismiss this action,” the motion notes. “The Wayne County board of county canvassers met and declined to certify the results of the presidential election. See the attached affidavits of Wayne County canvassing board members William C. Hartman [sic] and Monica S. Palmer.”

Attorneys and other legal observers immediately noticed a problem with the motion; Wayne County’s election board has not, in fact, declined to certify the results of the presidential election.

“You…can’t make something true by…just saying it in a Rule 41 Notice of Dismissal,” noted federal appeals attorney Raffi Melkonian. “Otherwise all y’all lawyers whose Rule 41s say something other than ‘We are dismissing this case because we have won and opponents owe us Eleventy Billion Dollars’ are doing it wrong.”

Arizona-based defense attorney and legal blogger @bmaz similarly rubbished the Trump campaign’s bizarre dismissal.

“Am I missing something, or is this borderline insane?” he tweeted in reply. “My understanding is that the certification was done, complete and irrevocably filed. What’s up with this?”

“I think that’s right,” Melkonian said. “My guess is they’re going to take the position that these affidavits somehow rescinded the certification and bring a new suit saying that.

Essentially the Trump campaign has moved to dismiss their own lawsuit because they believe their original request is now moot–based on the false belief/declaration that Wayne County reversed the certification. That’s not true, of course, but they decided to put it in their motion as if it were true anyway–a decidedly risky move.

“This morning we are withdrawing our lawsuit in Michigan as a direct result of achieving the relief we sought: to stop the election in Wayne County from being prematurely certified before residents can be assured that every legal vote has been counted and every illegal vote has not been counted,” Trump campaign attorney Rudy Giuliani confirmed in a statement.

Some said sanctions are in order.

The strategy was otherwise thoroughly mocked online:

Wayne County unanimously voted to certify election results on Thursday night. The two Republican members of the board noted in the motion previously expressed umbrage at being asked to certify those results but ultimately buckled under local pressure and accusations that they were attempting to throw out ballots of predominantly Black voters in a bid to steal the election for the Republican Party.

After talking with Trump on the phone, however, Hartmann and Palmer are now trying to take their votes back. To that end, they both signed affidavits alleging their votes were conditioned on “the promise that a full and independent audit would take place” because of “serious process flaws which deserve investigation.”

But that’s not the same as the county itself declining to certify the results. In fact, Wayne County officials balked at the idea that the GOP members of the board can try to take their votes back after the fact.

The board’s vice chair Jonathan Kinloch told the New York Times “that vote was final…that vote was binding.”

Hearne previously filed a lawsuit on behalf of the Trump campaign in a court that had no authority to hear the case.

[image via BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images]

Have a tip we should know? [email protected]

Filed Under:

Follow Law&Crime: