“RLUIPA ensures that municipalities must treat religious land use applications like any other land use application,” said U.S. Attorney Paul Fishman of the District of New Jersey in a statement. “But here, township officials kept moving the goalposts by using ever-changing local requirements to effectively deny this religious community the same access as other faiths.”
The ISBR alleges that the visible opposition by residents of Bernards Township appeared to be primarily steeped in bigotry. “Flyers, social media, and websites denounced the mosque and were filled with anti-Muslim bigotry and references to terrorism and the 9/11 attacks,” the complaint alleges, and the issues escalated to the point of the ISBR’s office mailbox being defaced to say “ISIS.” The local Planning Board ended up holding 39 hearings in three and a half years, which the complaint says was unprecedented. The application was eventually denied on December 8, 2015, three and a half years after it was officially submitted.
Allegations of steps that the Planning Board took to make the process more difficult include:
- Manipulating how the hearings were conducted so only the anti-mosque side would get to speak.
- Arbitrarily changing the number of parking spots required.
- Applying different fire safety standards to the mosque than to other, similar buildings.
In a statement issued last week after the DOJ made its intentions clear but before the lawsuit was filed, Bernards Township said that “The DOJ did not disclose to the Township the existence of a relationship between Plaintiff Mohammad Ali Chaudry and one of the lead DOJ investigators, Caroline Sadlowski, Chief of the Civil Division in the United States Attorneys Office for the District of New Jersey.” As for the allegations of anti-Muslim bias in the approval process, the statement included this denial:
The Township has vigorously denied this claim and has entered a defense. The Township maintains that the Planning Board denial was based on legitimate land use and safety concerns which Plaintiffs refused, and to this day, refuse to address. To that point, the Planning Board presented Plaintiffs an opportunity for reconsideration to address the land use issues early on, and Plaintiffs have shown no interest in complying.
[Photo: Artist’s rendering of mosque from court records]