Trump’s attorneys write:
Plaintiff’s sole justification for doing so here is his assertion that the video of Mr. Trump’s deposition contains “many spontaneous and ad hominem remarks that are not reflected in the paper transcript.” Plaintiff’s purposed reason for offering the veto as an exhibit is wholly insufficient given that a witness’s credibility is irrelevant at summary judgement.
The depositions, taken on December 10 and January 21, consist of testimony from Trump in which he answers questions about how the school was run. The depositions are taken under oath, so Trump must speak truthfully.
On Friday, attorneys for all of the major news outlets (except for Fox News) filed a motion to intervene. The media organizations are seeking to make public the videotaped depositions of Trump as a matter of the “public’s right to know.” Trump has yet to respond the media’s motion.
The former students’ attorneys are attempting to submit the video depositions as part of their opposition to Trump’s motion for summary judgement. Stay with LawNewz.com for the latest developments on this case